Displaying data sets 1 - 100 of 720 in total
Download CSV  
Gene ID Gene Name Tissue Study Parent A Parent B Stage Replicate Replicate Imprinting Status Overall Imprinting Status Imprinting p-value Imprinting Score A x B, A counts A x B, B counts B x A, A counts B x A, B counts % Maternal AxB % Maternal BxA Tot Counts AxB Tot Counts BxA Strain Score Strain p-value Genome Assembly Notes
Carubv10028584m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 no data no data 0.26 3 6 1 0 33.33% 0.00% 9 1 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10028584m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 PEG no data 5.24 x 10-20 0 24 68 15 0.00% 18.07% 24 83 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10028395m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 PEG PEG 0.0 16 45 218 27 26.23% 11.02% 61 245 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency PEG'
Carubv10028395m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 PEG PEG 8.9 x 10-11 6 33 23 0 15.38% 0.00% 39 23 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency PEG'
Carubv10028225m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 mat bias MEG 6.32 x 10-14 107 16 6 148 86.99% 96.10% 123 154 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Relaxed stringency MEG'
Carubv10028225m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 MEG MEG 3.49 x 10-8 30 3 3 82 90.91% 96.47% 33 85 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Relaxed stringency MEG'
Carubv10028170m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 MEG MEG 0.0 503 3 2 443 99.41% 99.55% 506 445 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency MEG'
Carubv10028170m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 MEG MEG 0.0 1552 13 4 1391 99.17% 99.71% 1565 1395 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency MEG'
Carubv10028088m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 PEG PEG 0.0 172 594 493 172 22.45% 25.86% 766 665 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency PEG'
Carubv10028088m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 PEG PEG 0.0 267 721 633 178 27.02% 21.95% 988 811 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency PEG'
Carubv10028086m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 PEG no data 7.32 x 10-4 1 21 17 8 4.55% 32.00% 22 25 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10028086m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 no data no data 0 8 0 0 0.00% 8 0 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10028076m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 MEG not imprinted 1.21 x 10-23 153 15 1 215 91.07% 99.54% 168 216 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10028076m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 no data not imprinted 0.0 0 0 8 95 92.23% 0 103 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10027954m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 MEG no data 1.07 x 10-7 45 0 2 72 100.00% 97.30% 45 74 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10027954m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 no data no data 0.43 14 0 0 2 100.00% 100.00% 14 2 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10027944m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted not imprinted 2.48 x 10-18 155 81 69 19 65.68% 21.59% 236 88 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10027944m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.0 59 17 53 27 77.63% 33.75% 76 80 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10027876m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 PEG PEG 1.75 x 10-9 3 22 20 0 12.00% 0.00% 25 20 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency PEG'
Carubv10027876m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 PEG PEG 0.0 0 44 133 33 0.00% 19.88% 44 166 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency PEG'
Carubv10027823m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 PEG PEG 0.0 5 55 157 31 8.33% 16.49% 60 188 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency PEG'
Carubv10027823m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 PEG PEG 7.84 x 10-12 4 38 34 5 9.52% 12.82% 42 39 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency PEG'
Carubv10027802m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted not imprinted 1.748 x 10-4 100 64 41 164 60.98% 80.00% 164 205 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10027802m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.0 120 58 13 294 67.42% 95.77% 178 307 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10027714m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 PEG PEG 0.0 0 21 137 21 0.00% 13.29% 21 158 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Relaxed stringency PEG'
Carubv10027714m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 no data PEG 7.79 x 10-6 0 13 15 2 0.00% 11.76% 13 17 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Relaxed stringency PEG'
Carubv10027700m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 PEG PEG 0.0 9 75 223 25 10.71% 10.08% 84 248 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Relaxed stringency PEG'
Carubv10027700m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 no data PEG 3.45 x 10-8 4 22 17 0 15.38% 0.00% 26 17 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Relaxed stringency PEG'
Carubv10027667m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 PEG PEG 1.0 x 10-30 14 200 140 51 6.54% 26.70% 214 191 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency PEG'
Carubv10027667m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 PEG PEG 1.08 x 10-23 26 89 122 52 22.61% 29.89% 115 174 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency PEG'
Carubv10027549m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 MEG MEG 1.76 x 10-13 188 3 12 170 98.43% 93.41% 191 182 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency MEG'
Carubv10027549m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 MEG MEG 0.0 359 13 2 369 96.51% 99.46% 372 371 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency MEG'
Carubv10027299m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 MEG no data 0.0 36 0 0 39 100.00% 100.00% 36 39 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10027299m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 no data no data 1.0 2 2 4 8 50.00% 66.67% 4 12 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10027273m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 PEG PEG 0.0 762 3729 5529 2700 16.97% 32.81% 4491 8229 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency PEG'
Carubv10027273m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 PEG PEG 0.0 315 1556 683 177 16.84% 20.58% 1871 860 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency PEG'
Carubv10027265m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted not imprinted 3.67 x 10-7 30 38 2 67 44.12% 97.10% 68 69 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10027265m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.0 33 14 15 197 70.21% 92.92% 47 212 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10027171m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 MEG no data 0.0 482 0 0 171 100.00% 100.00% 482 171 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10027171m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 no data no data 6 0 0 0 100.00% 6 0 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10026913m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 no data not imprinted 6.837826 x 10-1 5 10 9 22 33.33% 70.97% 15 31 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10026913m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 MEG not imprinted 0.0 23 0 0 110 100.00% 100.00% 23 110 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10026908m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 MEG MEG 6.35 x 10-5 67 0 6 63 100.00% 91.30% 67 69 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Relaxed stringency MEG'
Carubv10026908m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 mat bias MEG 1.36272 x 10-2 30 1 6 38 96.77% 86.36% 31 44 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Relaxed stringency MEG'
Carubv10026779m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted not imprinted 7.76 x 10-27 44 6 14 304 88.00% 95.60% 50 318 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10026779m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.05 37 3 43 129 92.50% 75.00% 40 172 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10026752m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 MEG MEG 3.26 x 10-7 51 2 0 58 96.23% 100.00% 53 58 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Consistent'
Overall status: 'High stringency MEG'
Carubv10026752m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 MEG MEG 1.18 x 10-14 20 0 0 128 100.00% 100.00% 20 128 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Consistent'
Overall status: 'High stringency MEG'
Carubv10026740m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 MEG not imprinted 0.01 78 5 3 30 93.98% 90.91% 83 33 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10026740m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted not imprinted 7.449079 x 10-1 26 11 10 17 70.27% 62.96% 37 27 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10026739m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 PEG not imprinted 6.42 x 10-11 6 24 33 6 20.00% 15.38% 30 39 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10026739m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.45 10 15 14 38 40.00% 73.08% 25 52 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10026722m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.0 59 25 10 85 70.24% 89.47% 84 95 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10026722m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted not imprinted 3.498 x 10-4 38 41 21 103 48.10% 83.06% 79 124 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10026494m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 MEG MEG 2.2 x 10-29 106 0 0 263 100.00% 100.00% 106 263 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency MEG'
Carubv10026494m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 MEG MEG 0.0 507 1 1 779 99.80% 99.87% 508 780 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency MEG'
Carubv10026429m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 no data PEG 2.962 x 10-3 20 43 10 3 31.75% 23.08% 63 13 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Consistent'
Overall status: 'Relaxed stringency PEG'
Carubv10026429m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 PEG PEG 0.0 7 94 196 42 6.93% 17.65% 101 238 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Consistent'
Overall status: 'Relaxed stringency PEG'
Carubv10026377m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 mat bias MEG 5.2 x 10-29 1386 206 205 962 87.06% 82.43% 1592 1167 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Relaxed stringency MEG'
Carubv10026377m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 MEG MEG 0.0 4413 418 368 3854 91.35% 91.28% 4831 4222 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Relaxed stringency MEG'
Carubv10026235m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.0 55 23 8 129 70.51% 94.16% 78 137 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10026235m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted not imprinted 5.454119 x 10-1 32 31 20 49 50.79% 71.01% 63 69 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10026226m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 MEG MEG 0.0 7405 778 722 6692 90.49% 90.26% 8183 7414 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Relaxed stringency MEG'
Carubv10026226m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 mat bias MEG 5.54 x 10-21 3575 331 176 773 91.53% 81.45% 3906 949 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Relaxed stringency MEG'
Carubv10026048m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 PEG PEG 1.09 x 10-12 20 67 64 28 22.99% 30.43% 87 92 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency PEG'
Carubv10026048m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 pat bias PEG 1.14 x 10-7 13 8 39 18 61.90% 31.58% 21 57 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency PEG'
Carubv10026004m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted not imprinted 4.79 x 10-21 1289 828 372 1302 60.89% 77.78% 2117 1674 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10026004m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.0 672 350 463 25 65.75% 5.12% 1022 488 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10025982m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.0 100 55 96 339 64.52% 77.93% 155 435 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10025982m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted not imprinted 4.71 x 10-11 149 60 14 153 71.29% 91.62% 209 167 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10025779m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted not imprinted 1.22 x 10-11 63 23 0 99 73.26% 100.00% 86 99 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10025779m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.07 138 59 47 136 70.05% 74.32% 197 183 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10025508m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted no data 0.59 53 0 11 28 100.00% 71.79% 53 39 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10025508m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 no data no data 1 8 0 0 11.11% 9 0 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10025506m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.0 176 149 703 1831 54.15% 72.26% 325 2534 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10025506m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 PEG not imprinted 0.0 65 301 396 136 17.76% 25.56% 366 532 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10025446m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 MEG no data 0.0 23 0 1 26 100.00% 96.30% 23 27 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10025446m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 no data no data 6.837826 x 10-1 1 0 2 6 100.00% 75.00% 1 8 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10025436m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 no data no data 0.0 0 7 8 0 0.00% 0.00% 7 8 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10025436m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 PEG no data 0.0 1 29 179 21 3.33% 10.50% 30 200 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10025355m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 MEG no data 0.0 307 0 1 198 100.00% 99.50% 307 199 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10025355m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 no data no data 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10025240m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 mat bias MEG 1.2 x 10-11 457 68 61 315 87.05% 83.78% 525 376 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Consistent'
Overall status: 'Relaxed stringency MEG'
Carubv10025240m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 MEG MEG 0.0 567 53 64 1025 91.45% 94.12% 620 1089 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Consistent'
Overall status: 'Relaxed stringency MEG'
Carubv10025066m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 MEG MEG 2.75 x 10-16 60 0 0 142 100.00% 100.00% 60 142 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency MEG'
Carubv10025066m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 MEG MEG 0.0 3131 8 10 1738 99.75% 99.43% 3139 1748 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency MEG'
Carubv10025064m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 MEG not imprinted 6.05 x 10-9 51 0 0 74 100.00% 100.00% 51 74 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10025064m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.03 140 23 57 169 85.89% 74.78% 163 226 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10024897m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 no data no data 0.01 0 8 5 0 0.00% 0.00% 8 5 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10024897m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 PEG no data 0.0 6 19 84 0 24.00% 0.00% 25 84 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10024888m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 MEG MEG 3.28 x 10-19 123 1 1 174 99.19% 99.43% 124 175 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Consistent'
Overall status: 'High stringency MEG'
Carubv10024888m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 MEG MEG 7.03 x 10-8 91 0 1 70 100.00% 98.59% 91 71 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Consistent'
Overall status: 'High stringency MEG'
Carubv10024881m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted not imprinted 5.231187 x 10-1 19 36 24 39 34.55% 61.90% 55 63 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10024881m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.93 15 43 39 76 25.86% 66.09% 58 115 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10024654m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted not imprinted 4.216104 x 10-1 18 148 44 73 10.84% 62.39% 166 117 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10024654m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 no data not imprinted 0.43 9 11 0 2 45.00% 100.00% 20 2 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10024602m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 PEG PEG 1.26 x 10-6 0 21 25 8 0.00% 24.24% 21 33 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Relaxed stringency PEG'
Carubv10024602m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 no data PEG 6.28901 x 10-2 2 16 8 5 11.11% 38.46% 18 13 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Relaxed stringency PEG'
Carubv10024582m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 PEG PEG 0.0 12 41 336 19 22.64% 5.35% 53 355 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Relaxed stringency PEG'
Carubv10024582m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 pat bias PEG 7.97 x 10-20 20 21 44 0 48.78% 0.00% 41 44 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Relaxed stringency PEG'