Displaying data sets 201 - 300 of 720 in total
Download CSV  
Gene ID Gene Name Tissue Study Parent A Parent B Stage Replicate Replicate Imprinting Status Overall Imprinting Status Imprinting p-value Imprinting Score A x B, A counts A x B, B counts B x A, A counts B x A, B counts % Maternal AxB % Maternal BxA Tot Counts AxB Tot Counts BxA Strain Score Strain p-value Genome Assembly Notes
Carubv10021394m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 MEG MEG 0.0 963 0 2 6019 100.00% 99.97% 963 6021 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency MEG'
Carubv10021394m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 MEG MEG 0.0 264 0 0 818 100.00% 100.00% 264 818 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency MEG'
Carubv10021385m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 PEG PEG 0.0 3 209 101 11 1.42% 9.82% 212 112 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency PEG'
Carubv10021385m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 PEG PEG 6.68 x 10-17 1 119 41 2 0.83% 4.65% 120 43 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency PEG'
Carubv10021370m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 PEG PEG 0.0 366 1097 931 221 25.02% 19.18% 1463 1152 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency PEG'
Carubv10021370m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 PEG PEG 0.0 599 2556 1525 576 18.99% 27.42% 3155 2101 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency PEG'
Carubv10021300m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 no data not imprinted 0.43 16 13 8 10 55.17% 55.56% 29 18 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10021300m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted not imprinted 2.405615 x 10-1 15 34 30 43 30.61% 58.90% 49 73 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10021211m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted not imprinted 4.475051 x 10-1 97 10 7 21 90.65% 75.00% 107 28 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10021211m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.05 30 10 8 38 75.00% 82.61% 40 46 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10021086m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted not imprinted 9.087511 x 10-1 42 5 7 15 89.36% 68.18% 47 22 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10021086m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.18 80 11 28 37 87.91% 56.92% 91 65 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10020917m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 no data no data 8.58373 x 10-2 0 0 2 0 0.00% 0 2 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10020917m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 MEG no data 0.0 21 0 0 232 100.00% 100.00% 21 232 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10020824m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 no data not imprinted 1.924282 x 10-1 24 2 1 9 92.31% 90.00% 26 10 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Accession bias'
Carubv10020824m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.07 64 8 18 64 88.89% 78.05% 72 82 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Accession bias'
Carubv10020813m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 mat bias MEG 0.0 591 100 17 365 85.53% 95.55% 691 382 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Relaxed stringency MEG'
Carubv10020813m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 MEG MEG 0.0 1413 76 46 2052 94.90% 97.81% 1489 2098 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Relaxed stringency MEG'
Carubv10020737m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 MEG no data 0.0 51 1 3 45 98.08% 93.75% 52 48 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10020737m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 no data no data 3.888294 x 10-1 19 0 1 6 100.00% 85.71% 19 7 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10020642m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 PEG PEG 0.0 8 54 131 27 12.90% 17.09% 62 158 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Relaxed stringency PEG'
Carubv10020642m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 no data PEG 4.79 x 10-18 6 8 52 7 42.86% 11.86% 14 59 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Relaxed stringency PEG'
Carubv10020580m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted not imprinted 5.51491 x 10-2 27 3 2 18 90.00% 90.00% 30 20 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10020580m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.26 45 8 16 48 84.91% 75.00% 53 64 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10020573m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted not imprinted 1.093 x 10-4 46 21 8 67 68.66% 89.33% 67 75 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10020573m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.0 173 43 36 240 80.09% 86.96% 216 276 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10020505m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 no data no data 3.110792 x 10-1 0 0 0 3 100.00% 0 3 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10020505m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 MEG no data 0.0 314 5 1 179 98.43% 99.44% 319 180 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10020498m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 no data not imprinted 3.34 x 10-9 18 1 21 1 94.74% 4.55% 19 22 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10020498m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 MEG not imprinted 0.0 46 0 0 23 100.00% 100.00% 46 23 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10020482m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 MEG not imprinted 0.0 5416 326 370 3263 94.32% 89.82% 5742 3633 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10020482m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.0 3757 336 607 2234 91.79% 78.63% 4093 2841 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10020480m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted not imprinted 3.415323 x 10-1 19 1 7 23 95.00% 76.67% 20 30 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10020480m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.58 34 10 24 40 77.27% 62.50% 44 64 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10020400m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 PEG PEG 0.0 307 4377 3284 203 6.55% 5.82% 4684 3487 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Consistent'
Overall status: 'High stringency PEG'
Carubv10020400m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 PEG PEG 0.0 136 3782 2152 315 3.47% 12.77% 3918 2467 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Consistent'
Overall status: 'High stringency PEG'
Carubv10020278m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted not imprinted 5.147958 x 10-1 307 138 107 194 68.99% 64.45% 445 301 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10020278m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.0 109 39 0 92 73.65% 100.00% 148 92 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10020206m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 no data no data 0.17 9 3 1 10 75.00% 90.91% 12 11 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10020206m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted no data 1.26 x 10-6 24 9 2 62 72.73% 96.88% 33 64 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10020115m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted not imprinted 0.0 725 428 111 2235 62.88% 95.27% 1153 2346 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10020115m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.0 182 74 38 538 71.09% 93.40% 256 576 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10020086m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.12 229 67 120 295 77.36% 71.08% 296 415 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10020086m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 MEG not imprinted 7.11 x 10-7 102 2 4 73 98.08% 94.81% 104 77 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10020084m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 PEG PEG 1.94 x 10-18 4 64 68 18 5.88% 20.93% 68 86 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Relaxed stringency PEG'
Carubv10020084m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 no data PEG 2.3 x 10-9 1 15 25 3 6.25% 10.71% 16 28 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Relaxed stringency PEG'
Carubv10019919m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 PEG PEG 0.0 4058 41143 45573 7902 8.98% 14.78% 45201 53475 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Consistent'
Overall status: 'High stringency PEG'
Carubv10019919m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 PEG PEG 0.0 4677 43306 26788 10558 9.75% 28.27% 47983 37346 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Consistent'
Overall status: 'High stringency PEG'
Carubv10019918m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted not imprinted 3.888294 x 10-1 34 12 25 38 73.91% 60.32% 46 63 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10019918m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.04 19 2 9 42 90.48% 82.35% 21 51 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10019748m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.0 18 4 12 243 81.82% 95.29% 22 255 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10019748m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 no data not imprinted 6.47 x 10-14 12 0 30 0 100.00% 0.00% 12 30 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10019544m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 PEG no data 0.0 0 22 175 9 0.00% 4.89% 22 184 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10019544m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 no data no data 0.0 0 6 7 1 0.00% 12.50% 6 8 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10019411m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted not imprinted 1.22 x 10-9 66 27 21 164 70.97% 88.65% 93 185 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10019411m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.0 61 24 6 80 71.76% 93.02% 85 86 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10019360m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 pat bias PEG 4.48 x 10-5 7 38 28 15 15.56% 34.88% 45 43 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Relaxed stringency PEG'
Carubv10019360m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 PEG PEG 3.74 x 10-10 15 52 47 19 22.39% 28.79% 67 66 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Relaxed stringency PEG'
Carubv10019243m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 MEG MEG 0.0 26258 3229 3491 52861 89.05% 93.81% 29487 56352 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency MEG'
Carubv10019243m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 MEG MEG 0.0 38167 3711 1277 39061 91.14% 96.83% 41878 40338 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency MEG'
Carubv10019209m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 MEG MEG 0.0 2096 61 82 1995 97.17% 96.05% 2157 2077 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency MEG'
Carubv10019209m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 MEG MEG 0.0 3451 133 112 4033 96.29% 97.30% 3584 4145 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency MEG'
Carubv10019121m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 MEG MEG 0.0 56 2 6 322 96.55% 98.17% 58 328 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Relaxed stringency MEG'
Carubv10019121m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 mat bias MEG 0.0 195 30 7 428 86.67% 98.39% 225 435 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Relaxed stringency MEG'
Carubv10019049m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted no data 8.34 x 10-6 2 56 30 15 3.45% 33.33% 58 45 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10019049m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 no data no data 0.43 9 1 0 2 90.00% 100.00% 10 2 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10019010m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 MEG MEG 7.99 x 10-28 367 1 6 279 99.73% 97.89% 368 285 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency MEG'
Carubv10019010m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 MEG MEG 3.93 x 10-6 35 0 0 48 100.00% 100.00% 35 48 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency MEG'
Carubv10018996m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted no data 0.04 30 9 2 20 76.92% 90.91% 39 22 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10018996m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 no data no data 6.64672 x 10-2 11 4 7 4 73.33% 36.36% 15 11 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10018734m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 MEG MEG 0.0 1318 2 7 342 99.85% 97.99% 1320 349 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency MEG'
Carubv10018734m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 MEG MEG 0.0 337 0 10 431 100.00% 97.73% 337 441 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency MEG'
Carubv10018628m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.0 25 21 12 315 54.35% 96.33% 46 327 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Accession bias'
Carubv10018628m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted not imprinted 0.0 90 43 50 626 67.67% 92.60% 133 676 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Accession bias'
Carubv10018513m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted not imprinted 3.13 x 10-18 24 6 0 160 80.00% 100.00% 30 160 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10018513m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.01 163 4 41 136 97.60% 76.84% 167 177 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10018490m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 MEG MEG 1.13 x 10-6 42 1 0 53 97.67% 100.00% 43 53 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency MEG'
Carubv10018490m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 MEG MEG 1.11 x 10-10 38 1 1 96 97.44% 98.97% 39 97 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency MEG'
Carubv10018204m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.0 59 22 7 82 72.84% 92.13% 81 89 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10018204m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted not imprinted 1.3349 x 10-2 79 45 41 134 63.71% 76.57% 124 175 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10018106m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 PEG PEG 1.24 x 10-24 16 165 78 14 8.84% 15.22% 181 92 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency PEG'
Carubv10018106m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 PEG PEG 4.48 x 10-8 10 73 37 15 12.05% 28.85% 83 52 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency PEG'
Carubv10018096m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.73 52 5 27 60 91.23% 68.97% 57 87 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10018096m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted not imprinted 6.56547 x 10-2 18 9 4 24 66.67% 85.71% 27 28 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10018079m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 MEG no data 0.0 84 0 1 292 100.00% 99.66% 84 293 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10018079m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 no data no data 3.110792 x 10-1 1 0 0 3 100.00% 100.00% 1 3 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10017919m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 PEG PEG 0.0 639 2047 1574 669 23.79% 29.83% 2686 2243 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Consistent'
Overall status: 'High stringency PEG'
Carubv10017919m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 PEG PEG 0.0 84 394 969 370 17.57% 27.63% 478 1339 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Consistent'
Overall status: 'High stringency PEG'
Carubv10017660m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.0 15 5 5 45 75.00% 90.00% 20 50 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10017660m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted not imprinted 2.801329 x 10-1 28 12 13 16 70.00% 55.17% 40 29 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10017633m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 MEG MEG 7.41 x 10-16 67 0 0 138 100.00% 100.00% 67 138 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency MEG'
Carubv10017633m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 MEG MEG 6.88 x 10-13 97 3 5 135 97.00% 96.43% 100 140 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'High stringency MEG'
Carubv10017599m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 MEG no data 0.0 49 0 3 129 100.00% 97.73% 49 132 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10017599m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 no data no data 1.874675 x 10-1 15 0 0 5 100.00% 100.00% 15 5 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10017535m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.0 68 32 86 63 68.00% 42.28% 100 149 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10017535m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted not imprinted 0.0 149 96 258 78 60.82% 23.21% 245 336 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10017495m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 no data no data 0.34 4 0 0 3 100.00% 100.00% 4 3 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10017495m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 PEG no data 1.07 x 10-9 0 37 30 6 0.00% 16.67% 37 36 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Low coverage'
Carubv10017439m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 2 vs 2 not imprinted not imprinted 1.023979 x 10-1 62 7 22 70 89.86% 76.09% 69 92 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'
Carubv10017439m.g endosperm Hatorangan et al. 2016 C. rubella Cr A C. rubella Cr B late heart / early torpedo 1 vs 1 not imprinted not imprinted 0.87 154 57 27 57 72.99% 67.86% 211 84 C. rubella v.1.0 Sanger Validation?: 'Not tested'
Overall status: 'Unstable imprinting'